-By Doug Perlson
Representing one of the brightest growth areas in the technology
and media field, Internet radio has managed to grow at an
astonishing rate. Surveys have shown that upwards of 80 million
listeners are tuning in each month, and online radio has grown at a
27 percent clip since 2000. Internet radio is also leading the
charge into new and exciting mobile ventures.
Just last month, several companies introduced wildly popular radio
applications for the iPhone that allow streaming music services
like Pandora, AOL Radio and Last.fm to work on the mobile device.
But, like many popular innovations, several online radio networks
are still searching for ways to fully monetize their booming
listener base. Internet radio’s profit margins are not what they
can be. However, a simple, counterintuitive method exists that
could benefit the music industry, artists, the online radio
networks and listeners. It has a tainted name, one with a long,
unpleasant history: paid-song inclusion, sometimes known as
payola.
We have seen a similar arrangement provide the financial backbone
for the online advertising search field. It is the much heralded
search marketing business model—the one Google has used to great
success. Advertisers have learned to love the “revolutionary”
ability to place bids and target their message to a highly specific
audience. An Internet radio “pay to play” advertising service could
accomplish a similar goal. The problem is the negative historical
associations. The practice so infuriated lawmakers in the 1950s
that they passed anti-payola laws with heavy monetary punishments
and potential jail time for violators. But the law did provide a
benefit for broadcasters. It gave the networks an exemption on
paying performance royalties to artists.
This law applied to both Internet and satellite radio. These new
media do not receive the performance royalty exemption, a subject
of furious debates in Congress and the press. In 2007, much of the
online radio industry almost went under based on questions of how
much networks need to pay per song. On the other hand, the way the
law is written, online networks should not be barred from accepting
payment for song placement.
Paid song inclusion will also benefit the “payees,” the artists,
management and rights owners. They would bid, in an organized,
fully transparent system, for slots on the Web’s best radio
stations, gaining exposure for new bands or promoting existing
artists on tour.
The music industry and independent artists would benefit from a
greater freedom of action. Thanks to the nearly instantaneous and
detailed information feedback provided by Internet radio, labels
can see in real time what works and correlates to sales. By the
same token, independent artists will, for the first time, have real
control over the promotion and distribution of their music. They
also will be able to target the people who are by far the most
likely purchasers of their products.
Best of all, paid inclusion would not harm the industry. With a
lower royalty burden and new revenue stream, many popular
commercial-free streaming audio services could blossom by
introducing one or two sponsored songs per hour instead of spoken
word advertising. Due to basic self-interest, networks will monitor
these “sponsored songs” to ensure that they fit in the format and
be reviewed for overall quality and appropriateness. They should be
properly identified in the media player as “sponsored music” and
allowed the same skipping functionality as other songs.
Advertiser self-interest will also serve as a gatekeeper—if the
sponsored song does not achieve the desired effect, the
“advertiser” will remove the song from rotation.
With the burden of performance royalty payments and the reality
that savvy radio listeners will not tolerate heavy ad play, online
radio networks have a number of challenges on the road to a big
financial payoff. Sponsored music may be the way to allow online
radio networks to pay their bills while maintaining a strong
listener experience.
Payola may be a dirty word for the music and radio industry. But
its use in online search advertising shows just how lucrative a
field it can be. In the right hands, and with the right audience,
paid inclusion could be exactly the win-win-win new revenue stream
that allows online radio to keep growing and providing great
content to its audience.
Doug Perlson is CEO of TargetSpot, Inc., an online advertising
network designed for Internet radio.
Opinion: Turning Into 'Pay to Play'
Online radio must brush away the past and embrace its future
Oct 13, 2008
-By Doug Perlson
Representing one of the brightest growth areas in the technology and media field, Internet radio has managed to grow at an astonishing rate. Surveys have shown that upwards of 80 million listeners are tuning in each month, and online radio has grown at a 27 percent clip since 2000. Internet radio is also leading the charge into new and exciting mobile ventures.
Just last month, several companies introduced wildly popular radio applications for the iPhone that allow streaming music services like Pandora, AOL Radio and Last.fm to work on the mobile device.
But, like many popular innovations, several online radio networks are still searching for ways to fully monetize their booming listener base. Internet radio’s profit margins are not what they can be. However, a simple, counterintuitive method exists that could benefit the music industry, artists, the online radio networks and listeners. It has a tainted name, one with a long, unpleasant history: paid-song inclusion, sometimes known as payola.
We have seen a similar arrangement provide the financial backbone for the online advertising search field. It is the much heralded search marketing business model—the one Google has used to great success. Advertisers have learned to love the “revolutionary” ability to place bids and target their message to a highly specific audience. An Internet radio “pay to play” advertising service could accomplish a similar goal. The problem is the negative historical associations. The practice so infuriated lawmakers in the 1950s that they passed anti-payola laws with heavy monetary punishments and potential jail time for violators. But the law did provide a benefit for broadcasters. It gave the networks an exemption on paying performance royalties to artists.
This law applied to both Internet and satellite radio. These new media do not receive the performance royalty exemption, a subject of furious debates in Congress and the press. In 2007, much of the online radio industry almost went under based on questions of how much networks need to pay per song. On the other hand, the way the law is written, online networks should not be barred from accepting payment for song placement.
Paid song inclusion will also benefit the “payees,” the artists, management and rights owners. They would bid, in an organized, fully transparent system, for slots on the Web’s best radio stations, gaining exposure for new bands or promoting existing artists on tour.
The music industry and independent artists would benefit from a greater freedom of action. Thanks to the nearly instantaneous and detailed information feedback provided by Internet radio, labels can see in real time what works and correlates to sales. By the same token, independent artists will, for the first time, have real control over the promotion and distribution of their music. They also will be able to target the people who are by far the most likely purchasers of their products.
Best of all, paid inclusion would not harm the industry. With a lower royalty burden and new revenue stream, many popular commercial-free streaming audio services could blossom by introducing one or two sponsored songs per hour instead of spoken word advertising. Due to basic self-interest, networks will monitor these “sponsored songs” to ensure that they fit in the format and be reviewed for overall quality and appropriateness. They should be properly identified in the media player as “sponsored music” and allowed the same skipping functionality as other songs. Advertiser self-interest will also serve as a gatekeeper—if the sponsored song does not achieve the desired effect, the “advertiser” will remove the song from rotation.
With the burden of performance royalty payments and the reality that savvy radio listeners will not tolerate heavy ad play, online radio networks have a number of challenges on the road to a big financial payoff. Sponsored music may be the way to allow online radio networks to pay their bills while maintaining a strong listener experience.
Payola may be a dirty word for the music and radio industry. But its use in online search advertising shows just how lucrative a field it can be. In the right hands, and with the right audience, paid inclusion could be exactly the win-win-win new revenue stream that allows online radio to keep growing and providing great content to its audience.
Doug Perlson is CEO of TargetSpot, Inc., an online advertising network designed for Internet radio.