NEWS

MAGAZINES AND NEWSPAPERS
SaveE-mailPrintMost PopularRSSReprints

Ipsos/PHD Study Shows Resistance to Paid Content

Oct 25, 2009

-By Lucia Moses


mw/photos/stylus/66745-MoneyandMouseM.jpg
Sorry, Rupert. Despite the News Corp. chairman’s hopes (along with all publishers) to charge for online content, consumers are loathe to pay, new research from Ipsos Mendelsohn and PHD reveals. Simply put, they’ve been trained to equate online with free.

The Ipsos/PHD collaboration confirms as much: 55.5 percent of survey respondents indicated they would be very or extremely unlikely to pay for online newspaper or magazine content. Only 16.5 percent agreed they are extremely, very or even somewhat likely. At the same time, 81.5 percent of online users of The Wall Street Journal’s and Consumer Reports’ sites—both pay sites—considered them to be a good, very good or excellent value. “The message that came out is that you can charge, but you better have incredibly compelling and unique data,” said Bob Shullman, president of Ipsos.

Other Ipsos findings didn’t bode well for the future of paid online content. There was little crossover between a publication’s online and print content, with 40.7 percent saying they looked into a print pub exclusively and only 3.1 percent saying they read the print and online version of the same publication. Respondents spent almost half the time (8.9 minutes) reading a publication’s Web site as they do reading print, and they visited magazines’ sites about half as often as they read the issues. (The frequency was a bit higher for newspapers’ sites.)

Not all the news was discouraging. The survey found online and print readers are younger and better educated than print-only readers. Their satisfaction level with print publications’ sites was 71.4 percent, almost as high as that of the pubs themselves. And readers’ overall likelihood of taking action was higher with the site than the print edition.

Also of relevance at a time when many print pubs are folding: Nearly 38 percent said that if a title stopped publishing but remained available online only, they would seek out its Web-only form. The rest were roughly split in between saying they would substitute another print publication or do something else.

The survey was conducted in July of 2,404 U.S. adults who were asked about 40 newspapers and magazines, including Newsweek, Cosmopolitan and Cooking Light.   
Survey Says…

1. 55.5 percent are very or extremely unlikely to pay for online print content. Only 16.5 percent are likely.

2. Only 3 percent read a publication’s print edition and its site.

3. In good news, more than a third say they would follow an online version of a shut-down print publication.



Ipsos/PHD Study Shows Resistance to Paid Content

Oct 25, 2009

-By Lucia Moses


mw/photos/stylus/66745-MoneyandMouseM.jpg

Sorry, Rupert. Despite the News Corp. chairman’s hopes (along with all publishers) to charge for online content, consumers are loathe to pay, new research from Ipsos Mendelsohn and PHD reveals. Simply put, they’ve been trained to equate online with free.

The Ipsos/PHD collaboration confirms as much: 55.5 percent of survey respondents indicated they would be very or extremely unlikely to pay for online newspaper or magazine content. Only 16.5 percent agreed they are extremely, very or even somewhat likely. At the same time, 81.5 percent of online users of The Wall Street Journal’s and Consumer Reports’ sites—both pay sites—considered them to be a good, very good or excellent value. “The message that came out is that you can charge, but you better have incredibly compelling and unique data,” said Bob Shullman, president of Ipsos.

Other Ipsos findings didn’t bode well for the future of paid online content. There was little crossover between a publication’s online and print content, with 40.7 percent saying they looked into a print pub exclusively and only 3.1 percent saying they read the print and online version of the same publication. Respondents spent almost half the time (8.9 minutes) reading a publication’s Web site as they do reading print, and they visited magazines’ sites about half as often as they read the issues. (The frequency was a bit higher for newspapers’ sites.)

Not all the news was discouraging. The survey found online and print readers are younger and better educated than print-only readers. Their satisfaction level with print publications’ sites was 71.4 percent, almost as high as that of the pubs themselves. And readers’ overall likelihood of taking action was higher with the site than the print edition.

Also of relevance at a time when many print pubs are folding: Nearly 38 percent said that if a title stopped publishing but remained available online only, they would seek out its Web-only form. The rest were roughly split in between saying they would substitute another print publication or do something else.

The survey was conducted in July of 2,404 U.S. adults who were asked about 40 newspapers and magazines, including Newsweek, Cosmopolitan and Cooking Light.   
Survey Says…

1. 55.5 percent are very or extremely unlikely to pay for online print content. Only 16.5 percent are likely.

2. Only 3 percent read a publication’s print edition and its site.

3. In good news, more than a third say they would follow an online version of a shut-down print publication.
COMMENT
 


Post a Comment
Asterisk (*) is a required field.
*Username: 
*Rate This Article: (1=Bad, 5=Perfect)

*Comment:
 

Mediafreak


  • Newsletter
  • Chat
  • Podcast
  • Column

CBS Wins Thursday Overnights; ABC Poised for Leadership Among Adults 18-49

2009-11-20

It was business as usual on Thursday, with CBS first in the overnights, and ABC expected to win the evening overall among adults 18-49 thanks to the ongoing strength of Grey’s Anatomy. Third in the metered markets was vastly improved Fox (which was up 58 percent year-to-year), followed by NBC and The CW. 

More

More Newsletters

Do you eat, breathe and sleep TV, but don't want to start your own blog?
Share your thoughts and opinions with thousands of TV lovers everywhere at Marc Berman's PIFeedback.com, a forum about all things television. The Programming Insider posts the previous nights broadcast ratings results and weighs in on any number of TV issues, from the latest hits to the best of the classics.
Click Here to Chat

Click here to hear Marc Berman's morning review of last night's TV highlights and lowlights. Berman, aka The Programming Insider, offers tasty tidbits from his daily enewsletter, dishes on TV news (occasionally with a guest editor from Mediaweek) and previews upcoming shows to watch or avoid.

x

Mr. TV: Stuffing TV Turkeys

It’s almost Thanksgiving, and incredibly this is my sixth annual column dedicated to the best and worst on the small screen. And as always, there are plenty of turkeys stuffing up the airwaves just waiting to be plucked by Mr. TV.

More

More Column


Get a daily update of the latest media news stories delivered to your inbox every morning.